Reposted from a thread on the Community Experts forum:
I think we have to consider who the target audience is for MAX. I tend to spend a lot of time wandering the halls and chatting to attendees (since few of the sessions have, historically, been advanced enough to be useful for me**). What always surprises me is just how novice-level the vast majority of attendees are. They *do* "want to see how to connect a data source directly to a control on a page" because that’s exactly how *they* will build it. They’re not going to build an enterprise app - they’re solving a point problem that is slightly
outside their comfort zone.
Those novice-level folks want two things from MAX: introductory material so they can learn and start using new tech; inspiring material that doesn’t feature a lot of advanced details that confuse them. They want to know what will be possible *when* they get good enough but they don’t want to be told *how* that advanced stuff works, just that it *can* be done.
Those of us wanting enterprise-level material and deep dive tech sessions are in a minority. Now, I’d sure like MAX to cater to us too - and I think Ted is trying to address that (partly, perhaps, so that speakers and community leaders are more inclined to attend MAX in the
first place). MAX 2008 was better than any previous MAX in that respect but I still got more out of the Unconference as a whole than the MAX sessions.
The problem for advanced users is that MAX is very expensive for the little return they get out of it. For advanced users that are on the prerelease programs, they’ve seen pretty much everything shown at MAX - at least around the products they use all the time. The "new" stuff
at MAX that wowed me was around products I don’t use much (Alchemy impressed me a lot but many attendees I spoke to had no idea why it might be useful).
For the novice-level attendees, MAX is a bargain, frankly. They get a huge amount out of it. I’ve chatted to them (at length, sometimes) and they *love* MAX. They complain most about the very sessions that the advanced users enjoy - code-centric / deep dive how-to sessions.
I don’t know whether that can be resolved. For most folks, budget makes it comes down to just one conference a year unless you’re a speaker. My conference-of-choice to attend this year is cf.Objective() because it has deep dive sessions.
I submitted topics to Scotch on the Road/Rocks because that’s a brilliant, fun conference and I want to attend - speaking eases the cost slightly (only slightly, to be honest, unless somehow they can cover airfare which they didn’t last year).
CFUNITED asked me to speak, otherwise I wouldn’t be attending that this year - like MAX, I can’t justify the ticket price for the amount of advanced content.
For me to attend MAX, the cost will have to be low enough - unless I end up speaking at MAX or it can offer me at least twice the value of cf.Objective() (since I’ll already be spending $1,000+ to attend that in May).
** MAX Barcelona was my "Learn Flex/AIR" assignment and, as a newbie in those technologies, I found the sessions on Flex and (especially) AIR very useful. I’m not generally in a position of needing to learn a new Adobe tech every year tho’...
Comments
> I think we have to consider who the target audience is for MAX. I tend
> to spend a lot of time wandering the halls and chatting to attendees
> (since few of the sessions have, historically, been advanced enough to
> be useful for me**). What always surprises me is just how novice-level
> the vast majority of attendees are.
I always found this a striking contrast between Europe and America. In
Europe it is often the experts who go to conference ... maybe through
seniority, better training budgets, whatever. in America, you are much more
likely to encounter novices at the conferences.
But as you say, MAX needs to have enough meat to satisfy the experts too,
otherwise not enough experts turn up to make it worthwhile for the novices
to learn from ...
---
We used to run Tips and tricks sessions at EuroTAAc - get 3 or 4 developers
on stage, with their laptops, and ask them to show us some stuff. They'd
show shortcuts, cool samples, unexpected 'cheats' etc. The right experts
bounce ideas off each other on the stage and show some super cool stuff, useful for existing experts and relative novices.
Sean,
I agree, MAX is not going to be an eye opener in the area you are the expert. Most likely, you will see things you have been practicing for a while adopted for mainstream. Nevertheless, MAX is a very good indicator of the current "mainstream" developers mix, and indeed you have more then fair share of novice developers due to the growth in the field. On contrary, if I would see a lot of experts and no fresh blood I would be tempted to leave the field. However, given the current economy news I wood expect more seasoned attendees and would hope content will be "upgrded" a little.
Now "on the content". For experts, unconference is inded better venue as it allows almost anyone that feels he has something to say - regardless of marketing and partnership status - their few minutes of fame. I would suggest bigger unconference and venue for publishing that content to make it worthwhile as it would give you better exposure. Other option to attract experts ( they are after all somewhat responsible for Adobe adoption) is to open up exhibition community floor.
The main part of MAX is networking. So if the information gathering is your quest, the only way to really get your money worth is to give you access to key Adobe team mambers that can answer your questions and talk about what they think the advanced stuff is. So format is BOF with 2-3 members of Adobe team on the subject talking and answering questions (15 mins of presentation and 35 Q&A) strategically spreaded so that experts can attend them While MAX is definetly hectic time for Adobe teams, informal nature and small rooms might be manageable.
Sincerely,
Anatole Tartakovsky
Suggestion for a lab i would really like to see at MAX - it's shocking how much this product is OVERLOOKED (file structures still say breeze...they dont even pay attn to this product much it seems like)
Suggested Topic and Description of proposed lab:
Did you spend a quarter of a million dollars on the Adobe Connect Enterprise software for your companies web casting needs? Then you realized you only received one PDF manual on it and the technical support turn around time is roughly 30 days? If so, this lab is for you. Figure out how to set up the servers, the file structure on the servers, and all the ins and outs of being an IT Administrator for the Adobe Connect Enterprise System.